Webb v Solicitors Regulation Authority
The tribunal was entitled to find that the appellant's actions in registering the property transfer were deliberate and dishonest, not an innocent mistake, and the findings were supported by the evidence. The absence of motive did not preclude a finding of dishonesty, and the tribunal's evaluation of credibility and inferences drawn were justified.
- Parties
- Claimant: David Alan Webb; Defendant: Solicitors Regulation Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Misconduct, Dishonesty, Breach of Undertaking, Conflict of Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Alan Webb
Claimant
Solicitors Regulation Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal erred in finding dishonesty against the appellant
- 2 Whether the findings of fact by the tribunal were plainly wrong or unsupported by evidence
- 3 Whether the tribunal was entitled to draw adverse inferences from the appellant's conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal was entitled to find that the appellant's actions in registering the property transfer were deliberate and dishonest, not an innocent mistake, and the findings were supported by the evidence. The absence of motive did not preclude a finding of dishonesty, and the tribunal's evaluation of credibility and inferences drawn were justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against the findings of dishonesty and the related order striking the appellant off the Roll of Solicitors is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment