Akodu v Solicitors Regulation Authority
The appeal was allowed because condition two was imposed in part due to conduct for which the appellant had been acquitted, and the matter should be reconsidered by an adjudicator to determine what the public interest demands in light of the remaining accountancy failures.
- Parties
- Claimant: Akodu; Defendant: Solicitors Regulation Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors Practice Conditions, Disciplinary Tribunal Appeals, Solicitors Accounting Rules, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Akodu
Claimant
Solicitors Regulation Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of condition two on the practice certificate was justified in light of accountancy failures and public interest
- 2 Whether the adjudicator's decision was affected by an error regarding allegations of failing to act in the best interests of lender clients
- 3 Whether the appeal should result in quashing condition two and remitting the matter for reconsideration
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because condition two was imposed in part due to conduct for which the appellant had been acquitted, and the matter should be reconsidered by an adjudicator to determine what the public interest demands in light of the remaining accountancy failures.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Condition two quashed and remitted for reconsideration by an adjudicator
- Appellant awarded costs for both appeals, to be assessed if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment