Moseley v Solicitors Regulation Authority
The claimant's conduct, though not dishonest or criminal, involved a lack of integrity and undermined public confidence in the profession. The tribunal's decision to strike off was appropriate and within the range of reasonable responses. The tribunal followed fair procedure and gave adequate opportunity for mitigation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Lloyd Moseley; Defendant: Solicitors Regulation Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Solicitor Misconduct, Striking Off, Failure to Disclose Assets, Public Trust in Profession, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Lloyd Moseley
Claimant
Solicitors Regulation Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sanction of striking off was appropriate for the claimant's conduct
- 2 Whether the tribunal's procedure was fair, especially regarding notice of sanction and opportunity for mitigation
- 3 Whether undue weight was placed on non-repayment of funds and insufficient weight on mitigation
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's conduct, though not dishonest or criminal, involved a lack of integrity and undermined public confidence in the profession. The tribunal's decision to strike off was appropriate and within the range of reasonable responses. The tribunal followed fair procedure and gave adequate opportunity for mitigation.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £8,904.60
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment