Skatteforvaltningen v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Others
No special circumstances exist under CPR 83.7 to justify a stay of execution of the costs order for payment on account. The factors raised by the DWF defendants were either already determined by the Court of Appeal or do not render enforcement inexpedient. The application is therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Skatteforvaltningen; Defendant: Solo Capital Partners LLP & Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Appeal, Application for Stay of Execution of Costs Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Joint and Several Liability, Payment on Account of Costs, CPR 83.7, Enforcement of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Skatteforvaltningen
Claimant
Solo Capital Partners LLP & Others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Appeal, Application for Stay of Execution of Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether special circumstances exist under CPR 83.7 to justify a stay of execution of a costs order for payment on account
- 2 Whether the complexity or unique nature of the litigation justifies a stay of execution
Ratio Decidendi
No special circumstances exist under CPR 83.7 to justify a stay of execution of the costs order for payment on account. The factors raised by the DWF defendants were either already determined by the Court of Appeal or do not render enforcement inexpedient. The application is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for stay of execution of payment on account of costs is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment