Solomon Browne v The Information Commissioner

Solomon Browne v The Information Commissioner

The tribunal lacks jurisdiction to review the substantive outcome of the Commissioner's decision or to grant the remedies sought. The application discloses no reasonable prospect of success under section 166 DPA 2018 and is therefore struck out.

Parties
Applicant: Solomon Browne; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Data Protection Tribunal Application / Strike Out Application Determination
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 DPA 2018, Tribunal Jurisdiction, GDPR Complaint Handling
Data Protection Administrative Law Section 166 DPA 2018 Tribunal Jurisdiction GDPR Complaint Handling

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Solomon Browne

Applicant

The Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Data Protection Tribunal Application / Strike Out Application Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Commissioner's decision under section 166 DPA 2018
  2. 2 Whether the application discloses any reasonable prospect of success under section 166 DPA 2018

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal lacks jurisdiction to review the substantive outcome of the Commissioner's decision or to grant the remedies sought. The application discloses no reasonable prospect of success under section 166 DPA 2018 and is therefore struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 is struck out.