Skanska Rasleigh Weatherfoil v Somerfield Stores Ltd
Only those terms of the June 2000 FMA necessary to define the Services were incorporated into the August 2000 Contract, which continued in force after 21 January 2001; no binding agreement on 'timing out' or settlement was reached prior to execution of a formal contract.
- Parties
- Claimant: Skanska Rasleigh Weatherfoil; Defendant: Somerfield Stores Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Declaration of contractual status and rejection of binding 'timing out' and settlement agreements
- Legal Topics
- Contract Formation, Interim Agreements, Incorporation of Terms, Estoppel, Settlement Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Skanska Rasleigh Weatherfoil
Claimant
Somerfield Stores Ltd.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Trial of Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Extent of incorporation of draft Facilities Management Agreement terms into August 2000 Contract
- 2 Whether August 2000 Contract continued after 21 January 2001
- 3 Existence of binding agreement on 'timing out' of invoices
Ratio Decidendi
Only those terms of the June 2000 FMA necessary to define the Services were incorporated into the August 2000 Contract, which continued in force after 21 January 2001; no binding agreement on 'timing out' or settlement was reached prior to execution of a formal contract.
Court Disposition
Declaration of contractual status and rejection of binding 'timing out' and settlement agreements
Orders
- The August 2000 Contract continued in force after 21 January 2001.
- Only limited terms of the June 2000 FMA were incorporated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment