Coleridge v Sotheby's
Sotheby’s was not negligent in its appraisal of the Coleridge Collar as post-restoration 17th century, nor in its auction estimate, as a responsible body of appraisers would have acted similarly. However, Sotheby’s was negligent in advising Lord Coleridge to sell privately at £35,000 rather than the standard private treaty value of £50,000. Damages are awarded for the difference.
- Parties
- Claimant: William Duke Coleridge, 5th Baron Coleridge of Ottery St Mary; Defendant: Sotheby’s
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Hedley Byrne Duty, Auctioneer's Duty of Care, Valuation Negligence, Damages Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Duke Coleridge, 5th Baron Coleridge of Ottery St Mary
Claimant
Sotheby’s
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sotheby’s breached its duty of care in appraising and advising on the sale of the Coleridge Collar
- 2 Whether the auction estimate and private treaty advice were negligent
- 3 Whether the contract terms limited or excluded liability
Ratio Decidendi
Sotheby’s was not negligent in its appraisal of the Coleridge Collar as post-restoration 17th century, nor in its auction estimate, as a responsible body of appraisers would have acted similarly. However, Sotheby’s was negligent in advising Lord Coleridge to sell privately at £35,000 rather than the standard private treaty value of £50,000. Damages are awarded for the difference.
Court Disposition
Claim partly allowed
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant for £15,000 (difference between £50,000 and £35,000)
- Court to hear parties on interest and costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment