Robb Simms-Davies v Southwark Crown Court
The principle of open justice applies to the publication of judgments approving DPAs, even where individuals have been acquitted and were not parties to the DPA proceedings. The claimant must demonstrate necessity for derogation from open justice to protect Article 8 rights. The judge correctly balanced open justice and privacy, finding no sufficient evidence to justify continued anonymisation.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robb Simms-Davies; Defendant: Southwark Crown Court; Interested Party: The Director of the Serious Fraud Office; Interested Party: Bluu Solutions Limited; Interested Party: Tetris-Projects Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Deferred Prosecution Agreements, Open Justice, Anonymity, Article 8 ECHR, Reporting Restrictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robb Simms-Davies
Claimant
Southwark Crown Court
Defendant
The Director of the Serious Fraud Office
Interested Party
Bluu Solutions Limited
Interested Party
Tetris-Projects Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the principle of open justice applies to the publication of judgments approving DPAs involving individuals who were acquitted
- 2 Whether the claimant's Article 8 rights require continued anonymisation in the judgment
- 3 Whether the judge adopted the correct legal approach in balancing open justice and privacy
Ratio Decidendi
The principle of open justice applies to the publication of judgments approving DPAs, even where individuals have been acquitted and were not parties to the DPA proceedings. The claimant must demonstrate necessity for derogation from open justice to protect Article 8 rights. The judge correctly balanced open justice and privacy, finding no sufficient evidence to justify continued anonymisation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Judicial review claim dismissed
- Judge's decision to publish judgment in un-anonymised form upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment