Penten Group Ltd v Spartafield Ltd
The adjudicator in Adjudication 1 had jurisdiction to decide the contract was governed by the letter of intent, as this was necessary to resolve the dispute referred. That decision is binding on the parties unless and until challenged in litigation. A subsequent adjudicator cannot revisit issues already decided.
- Parties
- Claimant: Penten Group Ltd; Defendant: Spartafield Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (construction Adjudication Enforcement) / Judgment on Declarations Regarding Enforceability and Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Declaration granted in part for claimant; adjudicator's decision on contract terms is binding unless challenged in litigation.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Contract Formation, Letter of Intent, Res Judicata in Adjudication
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Penten Group Ltd
Claimant
Spartafield Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (construction Adjudication Enforcement) / Judgment on Declarations Regarding Enforceability and Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adjudicator in Adjudication 1 had jurisdiction to decide the contract was governed by the letter of intent
- 2 Whether the decision in Adjudication 1 is binding and enforceable
- 3 Whether a subsequent adjudicator can revisit issues already decided
Ratio Decidendi
The adjudicator in Adjudication 1 had jurisdiction to decide the contract was governed by the letter of intent, as this was necessary to resolve the dispute referred. That decision is binding on the parties unless and until challenged in litigation. A subsequent adjudicator cannot revisit issues already decided.
Court Disposition
Declaration granted in part for claimant; adjudicator's decision on contract terms is binding unless challenged in litigation.
Orders
- Unless and until challenged in litigation, the parties are bound by the decision in Adjudication 1 that the contract was governed by the letter of intent and not the ICD terms.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment