D, R (on the application of) v Special Educational Needs Tribunal
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to explain why it rejected expert evidence and by making irrational factual findings; its reasoning was vitiated and the decision cannot stand.
- Parties
- Claimant: D; Defendant: Special Educational Needs Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Special Educational Needs, Dyslexia, Tribunal Reasoning, Duty to Give Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
D
Claimant
Special Educational Needs Tribunal
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by failing to address expert evidence
- 2 Whether the Tribunal gave adequate reasons for its decision
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's factual findings were irrational
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by failing to explain why it rejected expert evidence and by making irrational factual findings; its reasoning was vitiated and the decision cannot stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- decision of Tribunal set aside
- matter remitted to fresh tribunal for reconsideration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment