C, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Brent

C, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Brent

The Tribunal was entitled to find that M's educational needs could be met in a school, making it unlawful to specify education otherwise than at a school; no error of law or breach of natural justice occurred as the suitability of SLC was not a live issue.

Parties
Claimant: Miss C; 1st Defendant: Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal; 2nd Defendant: London Borough of Brent
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Special Educational Needs, Parental Wishes, Statutory Interpretation, Natural Justice
Education Law Administrative Law Special Educational Needs Parental Wishes Statutory Interpretation Natural Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss C

Claimant

Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal

1st Defendant

London Borough of Brent

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by failing to specify education otherwise than at a school for M
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant statutory provisions (sections 315, 319, 411, 517, and 9 of the Education Act 1996)
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of natural justice due to lack of warning about evidence requirements

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal was entitled to find that M's educational needs could be met in a school, making it unlawful to specify education otherwise than at a school; no error of law or breach of natural justice occurred as the suitability of SLC was not a live issue.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed