Shearer & Ors v Spring Capital Ltd & Ors

Shearer & Ors v Spring Capital Ltd & Ors

The issues concerning the validity of the tender—including conditionality, sufficiency of funds, and costs—raise triable issues of fact and law unsuitable for summary determination. The claim is not manifestly unsustainable and should proceed to trial. An interim injunction restraining enforcement of securities is granted pending trial, as there is a serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience favours the claimants.

Parties
Claimant: Iain Lawrie Shearer; Claimant: James Richard Debruyker Dawes; Claimant: Capital Cash Limited; Claimant: Jade Investments Worldwide Limited; Defendant: Spring Capital Limited; Second Defendant: Tenon Pension Trustees Limited; Second Defendant: Roderick Charles Thomas; Third Defendant: Stuart James Thomas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 October 2013
Procedural Posture
Redemption Action (cpr Part 8) / Interlocutory Judgment on Strike Out, Summary Judgment, and Interim Injunction Applications
Outcome
Strike out and summary judgment applications dismissed; interim injunction granted until trial or further order.
Legal Topics
Validity of Tender, Redemption of Mortgage, Equitable Relief From Interest, Conditionality of Tender, Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Interim Injunction
Equity Mortgage Law Civil Procedure Validity of Tender Redemption of Mortgage Equitable Relief From Interest Conditionality of Tender Summary Judgment +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iain Lawrie Shearer

Claimant

James Richard Debruyker Dawes

Claimant

Capital Cash Limited

Claimant

Jade Investments Worldwide Limited

Claimant

Spring Capital Limited

Defendant

Tenon Pension Trustees Limited

Second Defendant

Roderick Charles Thomas

Second Defendant

Stuart James Thomas

Third Defendant

Procedural Posture

Redemption Action (cpr Part 8) / Interlocutory Judgment on Strike Out, Summary Judgment, and Interim Injunction Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the tender of payment by the claimants was valid under equitable principles
  2. 2 Whether the tender was sufficiently backed by available funds
  3. 3 Whether conditionality (simultaneous release of security) invalidated the tender

Ratio Decidendi

The issues concerning the validity of the tender—including conditionality, sufficiency of funds, and costs—raise triable issues of fact and law unsuitable for summary determination. The claim is not manifestly unsustainable and should proceed to trial. An interim injunction restraining enforcement of securities is granted pending trial, as there is a serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience favours the claimants.

Court Disposition

Strike out and summary judgment applications dismissed; interim injunction granted until trial or further order.

Orders

  • Claim proceeds to trial; directions to be given for Part 7 procedure, defence, disclosure, and evidence.
  • Interim injunction restraining enforcement of securities granted, subject to suitable fortification of cross-undertaking in damages.