SR, R. v

SR, R. v

The trial judge correctly applied the law, provided adequate directions regarding missing evidence and delay, and the admitted evidence allowed the jury to assess credibility; no serious prejudice was established to undermine the safety of the convictions.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: SR
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Abuse of Process, Fair Trial, Evidence Admissibility, Credibility Assessment
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Abuse of Process Fair Trial Evidence Admissibility Credibility Assessment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 11
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

SR

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the prejudice suffered by the appellant due to missing evidence and absent witnesses rendered the trial unfair
  2. 2 Whether proceedings should have been stayed as an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge correctly applied the law, provided adequate directions regarding missing evidence and delay, and the admitted evidence allowed the jury to assess credibility; no serious prejudice was established to undermine the safety of the convictions.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • convictions upheld