SS v MCP
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficiently compelling circumstances or crisis to justify the exercise of the court's protective jurisdiction. The English court lacks jurisdiction to order the child's return or contact, as the child is habitually resident in India and no applicable international convention or...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: SS; Respondent: MCP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Wardship, Parens Patriae, Child Abduction, Habitual Residence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SS
Applicant
MCP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction to order the return of a child habitually resident in India
- 2 Whether the parens patriae jurisdiction can be exercised to require the return of the child
- 3 Whether the substantive threshold for exercising inherent jurisdiction is met
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficiently compelling circumstances or crisis to justify the exercise of the court's protective jurisdiction. The English court lacks jurisdiction to order the child's return or contact, as the child is habitually resident in India and no applicable international convention or statutory ground confers jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Father's application dated 4 August 2020 is dismissed
- Child ceases to be a ward of court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment