JM v Mr and Mrs T & Ors
ST's interests are best served by moving to Germany for care, and the English court's order is limited to arrangements until arrival in Germany, respecting the exclusive competence of German authorities thereafter.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: JM; Defendants: Mr and Mrs T; Defendant: St Marys NHS Trust; Defendant: Westminster City Council; Defendant: ST (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Inherent Jurisdiction / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Order made for ST to move to Germany for care
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests, Incapacitated Adult, Cross Border Care, Medical Welfare
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JM
Claimant
Mr and Mrs T
Defendants
St Marys NHS Trust
Defendant
Westminster City Council
Defendant
ST (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Inherent Jurisdiction / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ST's best interests are served by relocating to Germany for care
- 2 Whether English court should make orders affecting ST's care and residence
Ratio Decidendi
ST's interests are best served by moving to Germany for care, and the English court's order is limited to arrangements until arrival in Germany, respecting the exclusive competence of German authorities thereafter.
Court Disposition
Order made for ST to move to Germany for care
Orders
- ST to be moved to Germany as soon as possible for medical, social, and welfare care
- Arrangements for ST's care until arrival in Germany set out in the order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment