Halsion Limited v St Thomas Street Development Limited

Halsion Limited v St Thomas Street Development Limited

The Particulars of Claim were so prolix, unclear, and non-compliant with CPR Part 16 and the TCC Guide that they failed to provide a concise statement of material facts, making it impossible for the defendant to respond effectively or for the court to manage the case. The claims for construction, rectification, and estoppel by convention were not properly pleaded, and the claims for declaratory relief as to the effect of the adjudications and contract construction served no useful purpose. The only proportionate and practical response was to strike out the Particulars of Claim as a whole, with permission to apply to amend subject to compliance with the rules and guidance.

Parties
Claimant: Halsion Limited; Defendant: St Thomas Street Development Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction Dispute) / Application to Strike Out And/or for Summary Judgment on the Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Particulars of Claim struck out in their entirety; permission to apply to amend granted, subject to compliance with rules and guidance.
Legal Topics
Pleading Requirements, Rectification of Contract, Estoppel by Convention, Declaratory Relief, Interpretation of Construction Contracts
Civil Procedure Construction Law Contract Law Pleading Requirements Rectification of Contract Estoppel by Convention Declaratory Relief Interpretation of Construction Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Halsion Limited

Claimant

St Thomas Street Development Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (construction Dispute) / Application to Strike Out And/or for Summary Judgment on the Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Particulars of Claim should be struck out for non-compliance with CPR Part 16 and the TCC Guide
  2. 2 Whether the claims for construction, rectification, and estoppel by convention are properly pleaded
  3. 3 Whether declaratory relief as to the effect of adjudication decisions and contract construction should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Particulars of Claim were so prolix, unclear, and non-compliant with CPR Part 16 and the TCC Guide that they failed to provide a concise statement of material facts, making it impossible for the defendant to respond effectively or for the court to manage the case. The claims for construction, rectification, and estoppel by convention were not properly pleaded, and the claims for declaratory relief as to the effect of the adjudications and contract construction served no useful purpose. The only proportionate and practical response was to strike out the Particulars of Claim as a whole, with permission to apply to amend subject to compliance with the rules and guidance.

Court Disposition

Particulars of Claim struck out in their entirety; permission to apply to amend granted, subject to compliance with rules and guidance.

Orders

  • The Particulars of Claim are struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)(a), (b), and (c).
  • Permission to apply to amend is granted, subject to the court's approval of any redrafted pleading at a consequentials hearing.