Getty Images (US) Inc & Ors v Stability AI Ltd
The court found that the claimants' claims for copyright and database right infringement, trade mark infringement, and passing off raise triable issues and have a real prospect of success. There are factual disputes and evidential gaps that require investigation at trial, particularly regarding whether acts of development and training occurred in the UK and the involvement of UK-based personnel and resources. The meaning of 'article' for secondary infringement is a novel legal issue unsuitable for summary determination. The claimants are permitted to amend their pleadings to add the image-to-image feature claim, as it is properly particularised and raises arguable issues.
- Parties
- Claimant: Getty Images (US) Inc; Claimant: Getty Images International UC; Claimant: Getty Images (UK) Limited; Claimant: Getty Images Devco UK Limited; Claimant: iStockphoto LP; Claimant: Thomas M Barwick Inc; Defendant: Stability AI Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment and Amendment Applications
- Outcome
- Defendant's applications for summary judgment and strike out dismissed; claimants' application to amend particulars of claim granted.
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Strike Out, Amendment of Pleadings, AI and Copyright, Database Right Infringement, Secondary Infringement, Communication to the Public, Jurisdiction, Procedural Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Getty Images (US) Inc
Claimant
Getty Images International UC
Claimant
Getty Images (UK) Limited
Claimant
Getty Images Devco UK Limited
Claimant
iStockphoto LP
Claimant
Thomas M Barwick Inc
Claimant
Stability AI Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property / Interlocutory Judgment on Summary Judgment and Amendment Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants' claims for copyright and database right infringement, trade mark infringement, and passing off should be summarily dismissed or struck out
- 2 Whether the claimants should be permitted to amend their particulars of claim to add an image-to-image feature claim
- 3 Whether the pleaded facts and evidence provide a real prospect of success for the claimants' claims, particularly regarding acts occurring in the UK
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimants' claims for copyright and database right infringement, trade mark infringement, and passing off raise triable issues and have a real prospect of success. There are factual disputes and evidential gaps that require investigation at trial, particularly regarding whether acts of development and training occurred in the UK and the involvement of UK-based personnel and resources. The meaning of 'article' for secondary infringement is a novel legal issue unsuitable for summary determination. The claimants are permitted to amend their pleadings to add the image-to-image feature claim, as it is properly particularised and raises arguable issues.
Court Disposition
Defendant's applications for summary judgment and strike out dismissed; claimants' application to amend particulars of claim granted.
Orders
- Summary judgment and strike out applications by the defendant are dismissed.
- Claimants are granted permission to amend the particulars of claim as identified in the judgment, subject to provision of a final draft for review.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment