A & B (Fact Finding: Head, Bony, Eye and Soft Tissue Injuries)
On the balance of probabilities, the father was found to be the perpetrator of all non-accidental injuries to B (acute and non-acute head injuries, rib and metaphyseal fractures, eye injuries, bruises) by violent shaking and direct force. The mother failed to protect B by not seeking medical attention for bruises...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Staffordshire County Council; 1st Respondent: Mother; 2nd Respondent: Father of A; 3rd Respondent: Father of B; Children: A & B (children, by Children’s Guardian); 4th Respondent: Paternal Grandmother; 5th Respondent: Family Friend
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Judgment
- Outcome
- Findings of fact: father perpetrated all non-accidental injuries to B; mother failed to protect; family friend not found to have failed to protect; paternal grandmother excluded from pool of perpetrators.
- Legal Topics
- Non Accidental Injury, Failure to Protect, Care Orders, Children Act 1989, Safeguarding, Pool of Perpetrators
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Staffordshire County Council
Applicant
Mother
1st Respondent
Father of A
2nd Respondent
Father of B
3rd Respondent
A & B (children, by Children’s Guardian)
Children
Paternal Grandmother
4th Respondent
Family Friend
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Fact Finding Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Identification of perpetrator(s) of non-accidental injuries to child B
- 2 Failure to protect by mother and family friend
- 3 Application of pool of perpetrators principle
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the father was found to be the perpetrator of all non-accidental injuries to B (acute and non-acute head injuries, rib and metaphyseal fractures, eye injuries, bruises) by violent shaking and direct force. The mother failed to protect B by not seeking medical attention for bruises and breathing incidents, and by not safeguarding against the father's mental health risks. The family friend did not fail to protect to the threshold required, but her lack of candour raised safeguarding concerns.
Court Disposition
Findings of fact: father perpetrated all non-accidental injuries to B; mother failed to protect; family friend not found to have failed to protect; paternal grandmother excluded from pool of perpetrators.
Orders
- Permission granted to disclose comments regarding family friend’s safeguarding to her college.
- Findings to inform subsequent care proceedings and welfare decisions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment