Michael v Michael (No 3)

Michael v Michael (No 3)

Assets built up during a long marriage should be divided broadly equally, subject to adjustments for non-matrimonial property, illiquidity, and risk. Minority discount applies to business assets not operated as quasi-partnership. Tax liability arising from sham trust finding is apportioned, with the husband...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Stalo Michael; Respondent: Mario Michael
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 April 2025
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedies Proceedings (divorce) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Outcome
Final judgment with orders for lump sum payments, sale of family home, asset transfers, and contingent tax liability sharing.
Legal Topics
Financial Remedies, Asset Division, Tax Liability, Enforcement, Costs, Clean Break, Spousal Maintenance
Family Law Financial Remedies Asset Division Tax Liability Enforcement Costs Clean Break Spousal Maintenance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stalo Michael

Applicant

Mario Michael

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Financial Remedies Proceedings (divorce) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Division of matrimonial assets
  2. 2 Valuation of business interests
  3. 3 Treatment of sham trust and resulting tax liability

Ratio Decidendi

Assets built up during a long marriage should be divided broadly equally, subject to adjustments for non-matrimonial property, illiquidity, and risk. Minority discount applies to business assets not operated as quasi-partnership. Tax liability arising from sham trust finding is apportioned, with the husband primarily responsible but the wife liable for up to 50% (capped at £7.5m) if paid. Lump sum payments and sale of family home ordered to achieve fairness, with enforcement mechanisms and costs orders maintained.

Court Disposition

Final judgment with orders for lump sum payments, sale of family home, asset transfers, and contingent tax liability sharing.

Orders

  • Husband to pay wife lump sums totaling £15,000,000 in three installments.
  • Family home to be sold; wife to have sole conduct and occupation pending sale.