Various Claimants v Standard Chartered PLC [2023] EWHC 2756 (Ch) (08 November 2023)
The Brutus Allegations are adequately pleaded and supported by sufficient evidential foundation to proceed to trial; there is no basis for strike out or summary judgment. The Maxpower/Bribery Scheme allegations as to the Group Executive are sufficiently pleaded regarding PDMR knowledge, but claims based solely on the knowledge of Maxpower non-executive directors (not alleged to be de facto directors of SC plc) are unsustainable under current law and are struck out. The Individual Reliance Claims require further information but are not struck out at this stage.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 2756 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Various Claimants; Defendant: Standard Chartered PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Financial List (ch D) Securities Litigation / First Case Management Conference; Applications for Strike Out, Reverse Summary Judgment, and Further Information
- Outcome
- Application to strike out or for summary judgment on Brutus Allegations dismissed; application to strike out Maxpower/Bribery Scheme claims based on non-executive directors allowed; directions for further information on Individual Reliance Claims granted.
- Legal Topics
- Issuer Liability Under FSMA, Strike Out and Summary Judgment, Pleading Fraud and Dishonesty, Market Statements and Prospectus Liability, Reliance in Securities Claims, Director Liability (pdmr), Bribery and Sanctions Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Various Claimants
Claimant
Standard Chartered PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Financial List (ch D) Securities Litigation / First Case Management Conference; Applications for Strike Out, Reverse Summary Judgment, and Further Information
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Brutus Allegations should be struck out or subject to reverse summary judgment
- 2 Whether the Maxpower/Bribery Scheme allegations under s.90A FSMA are adequately pleaded as to PDMR knowledge
- 3 Whether the Individual Reliance Claims are sufficiently pleaded
Ratio Decidendi
The Brutus Allegations are adequately pleaded and supported by sufficient evidential foundation to proceed to trial; there is no basis for strike out or summary judgment. The Maxpower/Bribery Scheme allegations as to the Group Executive are sufficiently pleaded regarding PDMR knowledge, but claims based solely on the knowledge of Maxpower non-executive directors (not alleged to be de facto directors of SC plc) are unsustainable under current law and are struck out. The Individual Reliance Claims require further information but are not struck out at this stage.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out or for summary judgment on Brutus Allegations dismissed; application to strike out Maxpower/Bribery Scheme claims based on non-executive directors allowed; directions for further information on Individual Reliance Claims granted.
Orders
- Brutus Allegations to proceed to trial.
- Maxpower/Bribery Scheme claims under s.90A FSMA based solely on Maxpower non-executive directors struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment