Stannard & Ors, R v
The statutory language of section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is mandatory for qualifying post-4 April 2005 offences, regardless of the relative seriousness of earlier offences. The practice of not applying the new regime because earlier offences were more serious is unsound. Sentences must reflect the totality of criminality and the risk posed by the offender. Where jurisdiction to impose imprisonment for public protection is lacking, such orders must be quashed and replaced with determinate sentences under the appropriate regime.
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Appellant: Stannard; Appellant: Andrew; Appellant: Clarkson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed in part; sentences varied where jurisdiction lacking; otherwise appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Imprisonment for Public Protection, Dangerous Offenders, Retrospective Application of Sentencing Laws, Sexual Offences, Jurisdictional Limits in Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Stannard
Appellant
Andrew
Appellant
Clarkson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of imprisonment for public protection under section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applies when more serious offences were committed before 4 April 2005 and less serious after
- 2 Whether the courts erred in not imposing or in imposing imprisonment for public protection in the circumstances of each appellant
- 3 Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory language of section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is mandatory for qualifying post-4 April 2005 offences, regardless of the relative seriousness of earlier offences. The practice of not applying the new regime because earlier offences were more serious is unsound. Sentences must reflect the totality of criminality and the risk posed by the offender. Where jurisdiction to impose imprisonment for public protection is lacking, such orders must be quashed and replaced with determinate sentences under the appropriate regime.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed in part; sentences varied where jurisdiction lacking; otherwise appeals dismissed.
Orders
- Stannard: Sentence not interfered with; error in principle was to his advantage.
- Andrew: Sentence not interfered with; indeterminate sentence not imposed but sentence severe.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment