Houghton v Stannard [2003] EWHC 2666 (QB) (29 October 2003)
The claimant was not guilty of contributory negligence; the stationary vehicle with hazard lights did not present a dangerous obstruction, and the claimant acted reasonably in the circumstances. The defendant's failure to observe the stationary vehicle and hazard lights, despite clear visibility, was the sole cause of the accident.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 2666
- Parties
- Claimant: Houghton; Defendant: Stannard
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury (running Down Action) / Judgment on Contributory Negligence
- Outcome
- Allegations of contributory negligence rejected; defendant found solely liable for negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Road Traffic Accidents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Houghton
Claimant
Stannard
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury (running Down Action) / Judgment on Contributory Negligence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was guilty of contributory negligence in the circumstances of the accident
- 2 Whether the claimant's stationary vehicle with hazard lights constituted a dangerous obstruction
- 3 Whether the claimant acted reasonably after his car broke down
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was not guilty of contributory negligence; the stationary vehicle with hazard lights did not present a dangerous obstruction, and the claimant acted reasonably in the circumstances. The defendant's failure to observe the stationary vehicle and hazard lights, despite clear visibility, was the sole cause of the accident.
Court Disposition
Allegations of contributory negligence rejected; defendant found solely liable for negligence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment