Stapleton, R v

Stapleton, R v

The court was entitled to apply the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to offences committed after its commencement, and the judge was correct to make the confiscation order under that Act. There was no retrospective application, and the appellant failed to provide evidence to displace the statutory assumption regarding the source of her assets.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Stapleton
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Transitional Provisions, Retrospective Legislation, Burden of Proof

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Stapleton

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Confiscation Order

  1. 1 Whether the Crown Court had jurisdiction to make a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 when some offences predated its commencement
  2. 2 Whether the application of the 2002 Act was retrospective and unlawful
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in finding the appellant failed to discharge the civil burden regarding the source of assets

Ratio Decidendi

The court was entitled to apply the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to offences committed after its commencement, and the judge was correct to make the confiscation order under that Act. There was no retrospective application, and the appellant failed to provide evidence to displace the statutory assumption regarding the source of her assets.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • confiscation order of £24,975.85 stands
  • restraint order to be discharged unless money is paid into court