Hunt & Anor v Acres & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 2088 (20 December 2001)
No prospect of success in revisiting the merits of the Tomlin Order or judge's appropriateness; Article 6 ECHR argument is new and requires further hearing with notice to Legal Services Commission.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 2088
- Parties
- First Claimant: Mr. Hunt; Second Claimant: Mrs. Hunt; First Defendant: Mr. Acres; Second Defendant: Mrs. Acres; Intervener: Legal Services Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division
- Outcome
- Application adjourned for further hearing on Article 6 ECHR point only; all other grounds dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Charge, Tomlin Order, Article 6 ECHR, Legal Aid, Fair Trial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. Hunt
First Claimant
Mrs. Hunt
Second Claimant
Mr. Acres
First Defendant
Mrs. Acres
Second Defendant
Legal Services Commission
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Permission to Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compromise (Tomlin Order) should be set aside due to lack of legal aid and representation
- 2 Whether Judge Fletcher was an inappropriate judge due to circuit connections
- 3 Whether enforcement of statutory charge by Legal Services Commission breached Article 6 ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
No prospect of success in revisiting the merits of the Tomlin Order or judge's appropriateness; Article 6 ECHR argument is new and requires further hearing with notice to Legal Services Commission.
Court Disposition
Application adjourned for further hearing on Article 6 ECHR point only; all other grounds dismissed.
Orders
- Application adjourned on notice to Legal Services Commission for hearing on Article 6 ECHR point
- Applicant advised of risk of costs order if unsuccessful
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment