Roseoak Investments Ltd & Anor v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd & Anor

Roseoak Investments Ltd & Anor v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd & Anor

The proceedings were an abuse of process as they sought to reopen issues already decided without any change of circumstances; the claims lacked merit, no cause of action was established against Network Rail or Mr Bacon, and the default judgment was irregular and should be set aside.

Parties
Applicant/claimant: Roseoak Investments Limited; Applicant/claimant: Mr Davey; Respondent/defendant: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited; Respondent/defendant: Andrew Baker
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 December 2009
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Judgment and Strike Out Proceedings / Final Judgment
Outcome
claims dismissed
Legal Topics
Statutory Demand, Default Judgment, Derogation From Grant, Quiet Enjoyment, Misrepresentation, Reflective Loss, Abuse of Process
Property Law Civil Procedure Statutory Demand Default Judgment Derogation From Grant Quiet Enjoyment Misrepresentation Reflective Loss +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Roseoak Investments Limited

Applicant/claimant

Mr Davey

Applicant/claimant

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

Respondent/defendant

Andrew Baker

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Application to Set Aside Judgment and Strike Out Proceedings / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the default judgment should be set aside
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings should be struck out as an abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether there was a cause of action for derogation from grant, quiet enjoyment, misrepresentation, or nuisance against Network Rail

Ratio Decidendi

The proceedings were an abuse of process as they sought to reopen issues already decided without any change of circumstances; the claims lacked merit, no cause of action was established against Network Rail or Mr Bacon, and the default judgment was irregular and should be set aside.

Court Disposition

claims dismissed

Orders

  • default judgment set aside
  • Points of Claim struck out