Mowlem Plc (t/a Mowlem Marine) v Stena Line Ports Ltd [2004] EWHC 2206 (TCC) (06 October 2004)
The parties' relationship was governed by the final letter of intent dated 4 July 2003, which imposed a £10 million cap on Stena's payment obligation for all works, including variations and works after 18 July 2003. There was no waiver, estoppel, or conduct by Stena that displaced the cap. Quantum meruit was not...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2004] EWHC 2206 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Mowlem Plc (trading as Mowlem Marine); Defendant: Stena Line Ports Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 October 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed; counterclaim succeeded.
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Intent, Quantum Meruit, Contractual Interpretation, Waiver, Estoppel, Restitution
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mowlem Plc (trading as Mowlem Marine)
Claimant
Stena Line Ports Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil (technology and Construction Court) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mowlem is entitled to be paid a reasonable sum for works carried out beyond the limits of the final letter of intent dated 4 July 2003;
- 2 Whether the £10 million cap in the letter of intent applies to all works, including those after 18 July 2003;
- 3 Whether Stena waived or is estopped from relying on the £10 million cap;
Ratio Decidendi
The parties' relationship was governed by the final letter of intent dated 4 July 2003, which imposed a £10 million cap on Stena's payment obligation for all works, including variations and works after 18 July 2003. There was no waiver, estoppel, or conduct by Stena that displaced the cap. Quantum meruit was not available as a contract subsisted covering the works.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed; counterclaim succeeded.
Orders
- Declaration that Mowlem's entitlement to payment for the Works is subject to a maximum of £10 million.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment