I-A (Children), Re
The trial judge's failure to address and critically analyse the evidence of the stepfather and mother, and to properly weigh it against the child's allegations—especially given the child's history of fabrication and retraction—constituted a fundamental error. The findings against the stepfather were unsustainable and must be set aside.
- Parties
- Appellant: Stepfather; Respondent: Local Authority; Respondent: Mother
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Brighton County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Abuse Allegations, Credibility of Witnesses, Standards of Judicial Reasoning, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stepfather
Appellant
Local Authority
Respondent
Mother
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Brighton County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to properly consider and weigh the evidence of the respondent parents, particularly the stepfather, in allegations of sexual abuse
- 2 Whether the findings against the stepfather were sustainable given the credibility issues with the child complainant
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's failure to address and critically analyse the evidence of the stepfather and mother, and to properly weigh it against the child's allegations—especially given the child's history of fabrication and retraction—constituted a fundamental error. The findings against the stepfather were unsustainable and must be set aside.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Findings of the trial judge set aside, particularly paragraph j) of the schedule.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment