Williams, Re [2008] EWHC 154 (Admin) (01 February 2008)
The minimum term is set at 9 years, reduced from the standard starting point due to strong mitigating factors: the act was spontaneous and impulsive, the defendant intended only serious bodily harm (not death), showed remorse, and prior aggression by the deceased was a weak mitigating factor. No aggravating factors were present. The period is not reduced further for prison progress as the evidence does not meet the required threshold.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 154 (Admin)
- Parties
- Defendant: Stephanie Elizabeth Williams; Deceased: John Lamont
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Minimum Term Setting Post Conviction
- Outcome
- minimum term set
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Minimum Term, Sentencing, Mitigating Factors, Provocation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephanie Elizabeth Williams
Defendant
John Lamont
Deceased
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Minimum Term Setting Post Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate minimum term to be served by the defendant before eligibility for parole under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 for the offence of murder?
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term is set at 9 years, reduced from the standard starting point due to strong mitigating factors: the act was spontaneous and impulsive, the defendant intended only serious bodily harm (not death), showed remorse, and prior aggression by the deceased was a weak mitigating factor. No aggravating factors were present. The period is not reduced further for prison progress as the evidence does not meet the required threshold.
Court Disposition
minimum term set
Orders
- The minimum term to be served by the defendant before eligibility for parole is fixed at 9 years from 22 October 2002.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment