Agera & Anor v R
The judge's handling of the jury issue was justified and revealed no legal error; the summing up on DNA evidence was fair and not advocacy; the joint enterprise direction, though outdated, did not result in substantial injustice; the minimum term for life imprisonment was appropriate given the facts and aggravating features.
- Parties
- Applicant: Stephen Agera; Applicant: Stephen Lansana; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Robbery, Conspiracy to Commit Burglary, Joint Enterprise, Jury Bias, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Agera
Applicant
Stephen Lansana
Applicant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury was biased due to a juror's racist conduct
- 2 Whether the judge's summing up on DNA evidence was fair
- 3 Whether the direction on joint enterprise was correct post-Jogee
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's handling of the jury issue was justified and revealed no legal error; the summing up on DNA evidence was fair and not advocacy; the joint enterprise direction, though outdated, did not result in substantial injustice; the minimum term for life imprisonment was appropriate given the facts and aggravating features.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment