Wynne, R. v
The minimum term imposed was too high given the balance of aggravating and mitigating features; the use of the meat cleaver was properly considered as aggravating, but the mitigating factors warranted a reduction in the minimum term.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Stephen Alan Wynne
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Sentencing, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors, Minimum Term
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Stephen Alan Wynne
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the minimum term of 21 years for murder was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the use of a meat cleaver was an aggravating feature
- 3 Whether sufficient credit was given to mitigating factors
Ratio Decidendi
The minimum term imposed was too high given the balance of aggravating and mitigating features; the use of the meat cleaver was properly considered as aggravating, but the mitigating factors warranted a reduction in the minimum term.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Minimum term of 21 years less 181 days spent on remand quashed
- Substituted minimum term of 18 years less 181 days spent on remand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment