R v Stephen Blackmore

R v Stephen Blackmore

The sentence of six years and nine months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive; it was just and proportionate given the seriousness of the unprovoked assault, the harm caused, and the aggravating factors.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Stephen Blackmore
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 August 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Wounding With Intent, Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Appeal Against Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Wounding With Intent Offences Against the Person Act 1861 Appeal Against Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Stephen Blackmore

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for wounding with intent was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Proper categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines
  3. 3 Appropriate consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of six years and nine months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive; it was just and proportionate given the seriousness of the unprovoked assault, the harm caused, and the aggravating factors.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The sentence of six years and nine months' imprisonment is upheld.
  • Ancillary orders remain in force.