Carter & Ors, R. v (Sentencing Remarks) [2011] EW Misc 12 (CrownC) (16 August 2011)
The context of mass disorder and collective criminality substantially aggravates the seriousness of the offences, justifying sentences above the usual guideline ranges to deter future conduct and mark the gravity of the harm caused to the community.
- Citation
- [2011] EW Misc 12 (CrownC)
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Stephen Carter; Defendant: David Beswick; Defendant: Linda Mary Boyd; Defendant: Michael Gillespie-Doyle
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 August 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentencing
- Outcome
- conviction and sentencing
- Legal Topics
- Riot, Burglary, Arson, Robbery, Theft, Handling Stolen Goods, Assault on Emergency Workers, Violent Disorder, Affray, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Stephen Carter
Defendant
David Beswick
Defendant
Linda Mary Boyd
Defendant
Michael Gillespie-Doyle
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate sentencing for offences committed during large-scale public disorder
- 2 Application and departure from Sentencing Council guidelines in context of mass criminality
- 3 Aggravating factors arising from participation in collective criminal activity
Ratio Decidendi
The context of mass disorder and collective criminality substantially aggravates the seriousness of the offences, justifying sentences above the usual guideline ranges to deter future conduct and mark the gravity of the harm caused to the community.
Court Disposition
conviction and sentencing
Orders
- Stephen Carter: 16 months imprisonment (discounted from 2 years for early guilty plea), 6 days served credited under s 240 Criminal Justice Act 2003.
- David Beswick: 18 months imprisonment (discounted from 27 months for early guilty plea), 6 days served credited under s 240 Criminal Justice Act 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment