Topasna, R. v

Topasna, R. v

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the appellant's persistent pedal confusion, panic, and the devastating consequences including multiple deaths and injuries; the sentencing judge was entitled to place the offence in the most serious category.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Stephen George Topasna
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 July 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing Guidelines, Culpability Assessment
Criminal Law Causing Death by Dangerous Driving Sentencing Guidelines Culpability Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Stephen George Topasna

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing death by dangerous driving was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Appropriate categorisation of culpability for the offence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive given the appellant's persistent pedal confusion, panic, and the devastating consequences including multiple deaths and injuries; the sentencing judge was entitled to place the offence in the most serious category.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • sentence of five years' imprisonment concurrent on each count upheld
  • disqualification from driving for seven years upheld