Forbes & Ors, R v
Historic sexual offences must be sentenced according to current sentencing practice, with measured reference to current guidelines, but capped by the statutory maximum at the time of offence. Abuse of trust must be factually justified. Immaturity at time of offence affects culpability. Article 7 ECHR prohibits...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Stephen John Forbes; Appellant: Barry James Warren; Applicant: John Eric Clark; Applicant: Anthony John McCallen; Appellant: BD; Appellant: Mark David Anthony Rouse; Applicant: Dean Tarrant; Applicant: Alan Charles Foulkes; Applicant: David Farlow
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Mixed: Some appeals allowed, others dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Historic Sexual Offences, Abuse of Trust, Mitigation, Totality Principle, Article 7 ECHR, Indictment Defects
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Stephen John Forbes
Appellant
Barry James Warren
Appellant
John Eric Clark
Applicant
Anthony John McCallen
Applicant
BD
Appellant
Mark David Anthony Rouse
Appellant
Dean Tarrant
Applicant
Alan Charles Foulkes
Applicant
David Farlow
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper approach to sentencing for historic sexual offences
- 2 Application of current sentencing guidelines to offences committed under previous statutes
- 3 Role of abuse of trust as aggravating factor
Ratio Decidendi
Historic sexual offences must be sentenced according to current sentencing practice, with measured reference to current guidelines, but capped by the statutory maximum at the time of offence. Abuse of trust must be factually justified. Immaturity at time of offence affects culpability. Article 7 ECHR prohibits custodial sentences where none was available at the time. Procedural defects in indictments do not invalidate convictions if the accused was not misled and the defect is formal.
Court Disposition
Mixed: Some appeals allowed, others dismissed.
Orders
- Forbes: Appeal dismissed, sentence upheld.
- Warren: Appeal allowed, sentence reduced to seven years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment