Stephens & Anor v Cannon & Anor
The master was not entitled to resort to the burden of proof in assessing the value of the hypothetical property without demonstrating that he had striven to resolve the evidential conflict and explaining why he could not reasonably do so; the damages award and costs order must be set aside and the issue remitted for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen John Stephens; Appellant: Sheila Dilys Stephens; Respondent: Charles Cannon; Respondent: Sheila Cannon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal rendered academic.
- Legal Topics
- Damages Assessment, Burden of Proof, Overage Provisions, Specific Performance, Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen John Stephens
Appellant
Sheila Dilys Stephens
Appellant
Charles Cannon
Respondent
Sheila Cannon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Chancery Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of overage condition and supplemental agreement
- 2 Appropriate assessment of damages based on hypothetical property value
- 3 Judicial duty regarding burden of proof in valuation disputes
Ratio Decidendi
The master was not entitled to resort to the burden of proof in assessing the value of the hypothetical property without demonstrating that he had striven to resolve the evidential conflict and explaining why he could not reasonably do so; the damages award and costs order must be set aside and the issue remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal rendered academic.
Orders
- Damages award set aside.
- Costs order set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment