Hope Capital 2 Ltd v Jones [2024] EWHC 1308 (Ch) (05 June 2024)

Hope Capital 2 Ltd v Jones [2024] EWHC 1308 (Ch) (05 June 2024)

The Defendant failed to show any real prospect that the 'New Agreement' or any undisclosed document varied or discharged his obligations under the original Loan Agreement or Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity. The documents produced confirmed no such variation or discharge occurred, and the Guarantee expressly excluded...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 1308 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Hope Capital 2 Limited; Defendant: Stephen Michael Jones
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal (chancery Division, Summary Judgment) / Judgment on Appeal From Summary Judgment Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Guarantees and Indemnities, Loan Agreements, Summary Judgment, Variation and Discharge of Contract, Security Interests
Commercial Law Contract Law Property Law Guarantees and Indemnities Loan Agreements Summary Judgment Variation and Discharge of Contract Security Interests

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hope Capital 2 Limited

Claimant

Stephen Michael Jones

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (chancery Division, Summary Judgment) / Judgment on Appeal From Summary Judgment Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a 'New Agreement' varied or discharged the obligations under the original Loan Agreement and Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity relied upon by the Claimant
  2. 2 Whether further evidence or disclosure could materially affect the Defendant's liability under the Guarantee

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant failed to show any real prospect that the 'New Agreement' or any undisclosed document varied or discharged his obligations under the original Loan Agreement or Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity. The documents produced confirmed no such variation or discharge occurred, and the Guarantee expressly excluded such effects. No further evidence or disclosure could alter this conclusion.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; summary judgment for the Claimant stands
  • Defendant to pay Claimant's costs of the appeal, including costs of compliance with the court's order for disclosure, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed or summary assessment if agreed