Hope Capital 2 Limited v Stephen Michael Jones

Hope Capital 2 Limited v Stephen Michael Jones

The Defendant failed to demonstrate that the New Agreement varied or discharged his obligations under the Loan Agreement or Guarantee. The documents disclosed by the Claimant showed no provision affecting the Defendant's liability. The contractual terms expressly prevented discharge or reduction of liability by such arrangements. There was no real prospect of success for the Defendant's appeal.

Parties
Claimant: Hope Capital 2 Limited; Defendant: Stephen Michael Jones
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Variation and Discharge of Contract, Disclosure, Guarantee Liability
Contract Law Guarantees and Indemnities Civil Procedure Summary Judgment Variation and Discharge of Contract Disclosure Guarantee Liability

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hope Capital 2 Limited

Claimant

Stephen Michael Jones

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the New Agreement varied or discharged the provisions of the Loan Agreement and/or Deed of Guarantee and Indemnity
  2. 2 Whether further evidence might materially assist the Court in deciding the litigation

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant failed to demonstrate that the New Agreement varied or discharged his obligations under the Loan Agreement or Guarantee. The documents disclosed by the Claimant showed no provision affecting the Defendant's liability. The contractual terms expressly prevented discharge or reduction of liability by such arrangements. There was no real prospect of success for the Defendant's appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Claimant's costs of the appeal, including costs of complying with the Order dated 24 April 2024
  • Costs to be subject to detailed assessment on the standard basis if not agreed