Miller, R (on the application of) v The Independent Assessor
The Independent Assessor erred in law by failing to make proper use of civil law awards for false imprisonment and by awarding a sum for loss of liberty that was irrationally low, lacking adequate explanation or proportionality to analogous civil awards. The Divisional Court erred in failing to recognise this legal error.
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Miller; Respondent: The Independent Assessor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Miscarriage of Justice, Compensation Assessment, Damages for False Imprisonment, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Miller
Appellant
The Independent Assessor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Divisional Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Independent Assessor erred in law in assessing compensation for loss of liberty following a miscarriage of justice
- 2 Whether the award for loss of liberty was irrationally low and failed to apply analogous principles from civil law damages
Ratio Decidendi
The Independent Assessor erred in law by failing to make proper use of civil law awards for false imprisonment and by awarding a sum for loss of liberty that was irrationally low, lacking adequate explanation or proportionality to analogous civil awards. The Divisional Court erred in failing to recognise this legal error.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Case remitted to the Independent Assessor to re-assess the award for loss of liberty and the consequences of imprisonment in accordance with the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment