S, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 756 (06 March 2006)

S, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 756 (06 March 2006)

The judge correctly refused a stay as the delay, while significant, did not render a fair trial impossible; all relevant factors were considered and the trial process, including judicial directions, safeguarded fairness. The caution was properly admitted as bad character evidence. The conviction was not unsafe.

Citation
[2006] EWCA Crim 756
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Stephen Paul S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 March 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentences for indecent assault quashed and substituted with lawful terms.
Legal Topics
Rape, Indecent Assault, Abuse of Process, Delay in Prosecution, Bad Character Evidence
Criminal Law Rape Indecent Assault Abuse of Process Delay in Prosecution Bad Character Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Stephen Paul S

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing a stay of proceedings on grounds of delay
  2. 2 Whether the admission of bad character evidence (a caution) was lawful
  3. 3 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to procedural or evidential unfairness

Ratio Decidendi

The judge correctly refused a stay as the delay, while significant, did not render a fair trial impossible; all relevant factors were considered and the trial process, including judicial directions, safeguarded fairness. The caution was properly admitted as bad character evidence. The conviction was not unsafe.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; sentences for indecent assault quashed and substituted with lawful terms.

Orders

  • Sentences of 4 years for indecent assault quashed and replaced with 2 years each, to run concurrently with each other and with the 7 years for rape.
  • Appeal against conviction dismissed.