Simpson, R v

Simpson, R v

The burglary offences, though serious and involving occupied premises, did not justify category 1 classification based on deliberate targeting; mitigation and guilty plea warranted reduction to 16 months' detention for each burglary offence, concurrent, and two months' detention for taking the motor vehicle, consecutive; driving disqualification adjusted to thirteen months to reflect time spent in custody.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Stephen Simpson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Burglary, Sentencing, Taking Motor Vehicle Without Consent, Driving Disqualification

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Stephen Simpson

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the categorisation of burglary offences as category 1 was justified
  2. 2 Appropriateness of consecutive sentence for taking a motor vehicle without consent
  3. 3 Proper calculation of driving disqualification period

Ratio Decidendi

The burglary offences, though serious and involving occupied premises, did not justify category 1 classification based on deliberate targeting; mitigation and guilty plea warranted reduction to 16 months' detention for each burglary offence, concurrent, and two months' detention for taking the motor vehicle, consecutive; driving disqualification adjusted to thirteen months to reflect time spent in custody.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Sentence of two years and four months' detention quashed
  • Concurrent sentences of 16 months' detention for each burglary offence substituted