Smith & Anor, R. v [2006] EWCA Crim 901 (05 April 2006)
Leyford Smith's criminal history and attitude indicate ongoing risk to the public, justifying a discretionary life sentence; Stephen Smith's lack of prior convictions and supporting role do not justify a life sentence, warranting a determinate sentence instead.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Crim 901
- Parties
- Appellant: Stephen Smith; Appellant: Leyford Smith; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Leyford Smith's appeal against sentence dismissed; Stephen Smith's appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Sentencing, Discretionary Life Sentence, Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Smith
Appellant
Leyford Smith
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether discretionary life sentences were appropriate for attempted contract killing
- 2 Assessment of risk to public for indeterminate period
- 3 Appropriateness of determinate sentence for Stephen Smith
Ratio Decidendi
Leyford Smith's criminal history and attitude indicate ongoing risk to the public, justifying a discretionary life sentence; Stephen Smith's lack of prior convictions and supporting role do not justify a life sentence, warranting a determinate sentence instead.
Court Disposition
Leyford Smith's appeal against sentence dismissed; Stephen Smith's appeal allowed.
Orders
- Leyford Smith's life sentence upheld with minimum term of eight years and six months.
- Stephen Smith's life sentence quashed and replaced with a determinate sentence of fifteen years' imprisonment, with 310 days served to count towards sentence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment