Tyndale, R. v

The applicant is entitled to a pronouncement of 93 days credit under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, and the extension of time is granted as there was no lack of due diligence.

Parties: Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Stephen Tyndale
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 17 July 2020
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: application allowed
Legal Topics: Conspiracy to Defraud, Conspiracy to Conceal Criminal Property, Sentencing Credit for Curfew, Extension of Time for Appeal

Criminal Law Conspiracy to Defraud Conspiracy to Conceal Criminal Property Sentencing Credit for Curfew Extension of Time for Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Stephen Tyndale

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant is entitled to credit for time spent on qualifying curfew under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
2 Whether an extension of time for the application should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant is entitled to a pronouncement of 93 days credit under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, and the extension of time is granted as there was no lack of due diligence.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

Extension of time to appeal granted
Pronouncement made that the number of days under section 240A of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 is 93 days