Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon (Rev 1)
Permission to amend to add a public interest defence was refused due to failure to properly particularise investigations, confusion between subjective belief and objective truth, lack of chronology, and inadequate explanation for delay. Permission to amend particulars of truth was granted as they expanded on the existing defence and had a real prospect of success.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jamal Hijazi; Defendant: Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence
- Outcome
- Application to amend defence to add public interest defence refused; permission to amend particulars of truth granted.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Amendment of Pleadings, Public Interest Defence, Truth Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamal Hijazi
Claimant
Stephen Yaxley-Lennon
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Application to Amend Defence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to amend the defence to add a public interest defence under s.4 Defamation Act 2013
- 2 Whether permission should be granted to amend particulars of truth
- 3 Whether delay and procedural conduct justify refusal of amendment
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend to add a public interest defence was refused due to failure to properly particularise investigations, confusion between subjective belief and objective truth, lack of chronology, and inadequate explanation for delay. Permission to amend particulars of truth was granted as they expanded on the existing defence and had a real prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Application to amend defence to add public interest defence refused; permission to amend particulars of truth granted.
Orders
- Permission to amend particulars of truth granted.
- Permission to amend to add public interest defence refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment