Gallant, R v

Gallant, R v

The judge's directions were appropriate given the issues and evidence; there was no evidential basis for a manslaughter verdict, and the appellant's conviction for murder was safe.

Parties
Prosecutor: R; Appellant: Steven Gallant
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction upheld
Legal Topics
Murder, Joint Enterprise, Withdrawal From Joint Enterprise, Manslaughter Alternative Verdicts
Criminal Law Murder Joint Enterprise Withdrawal From Joint Enterprise Manslaughter Alternative Verdicts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Prosecutor

Steven Gallant

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge failed to direct the jury adequately on the legal consequences of withdrawal from joint enterprise
  2. 2 Whether the trial judge erred in not leaving the alternative verdict of manslaughter to the jury

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's directions were appropriate given the issues and evidence; there was no evidential basis for a manslaughter verdict, and the appellant's conviction for murder was safe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction upheld