R v Steven Gordon
The judge was entitled to impose a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 given the seriousness of the offence, the risk of future harm, and the lack of evidence that such a decision was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable, despite contrary psychiatric evidence.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Steven Gordon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hospital Orders, Restriction Orders, Section 37 Mental Health Act, Section 41 Mental Health Act, Unlawful Wounding, Threatening With a Bladed Article, Psychiatric Evidence, Risk Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Steven Gordon
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in imposing a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 despite unanimous psychiatric evidence against it
- 2 Whether the imposition of the restriction order was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to impose a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 given the seriousness of the offence, the risk of future harm, and the lack of evidence that such a decision was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable, despite contrary psychiatric evidence.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 upheld
- Hospital order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 concurrent on each count upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment