R v Steven Gordon

R v Steven Gordon

The judge was entitled to impose a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 given the seriousness of the offence, the risk of future harm, and the lack of evidence that such a decision was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable, despite contrary psychiatric evidence.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Steven Gordon
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Hospital Orders, Restriction Orders, Section 37 Mental Health Act, Section 41 Mental Health Act, Unlawful Wounding, Threatening With a Bladed Article, Psychiatric Evidence, Risk Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Steven Gordon

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in imposing a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 despite unanimous psychiatric evidence against it
  2. 2 Whether the imposition of the restriction order was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable

Ratio Decidendi

The judge was entitled to impose a restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 given the seriousness of the offence, the risk of future harm, and the lack of evidence that such a decision was irrational or Wednesbury unreasonable, despite contrary psychiatric evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Restriction order under section 41 of the Mental Health Act 1983 upheld
  • Hospital order under section 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983 concurrent on each count upheld