Steven Hague v The Commissioners for HMRC
The Tribunal found that the HMRC officer subjectively and objectively believed there was an insufficiency of tax for the relevant years, satisfying s 29(1) TMA. The time limits for raising assessments were properly extended due to the appellant's negligent and deliberate failure to notify chargeability. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving the assessments were excessive or to provide credible evidence for further reduction. The penalties were properly imposed for deliberate failure to notify, with the mitigation applied by HMRC being reasonable. The appeal was dismissed and the revised assessments and penalties confirmed in full.
- Parties
- Appellant: Steven Hague; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Capital Gains Tax, Discovery Assessments, Penalties for Failure to Notify, Time Limits for Assessments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Hague
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC validly raised discovery assessments under s 29(1) TMA 1970 for years where no returns were filed
- 2 Whether the officer subjectively and objectively believed there was an insufficiency of tax
- 3 Whether time limits for raising assessments were properly extended under s 36 TMA
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the HMRC officer subjectively and objectively believed there was an insufficiency of tax for the relevant years, satisfying s 29(1) TMA. The time limits for raising assessments were properly extended due to the appellant's negligent and deliberate failure to notify chargeability. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proving the assessments were excessive or to provide credible evidence for further reduction. The penalties were properly imposed for deliberate failure to notify, with the mitigation applied by HMRC being reasonable. The appeal was dismissed and the revised assessments and penalties confirmed in full.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Discovery assessments for 2007-08 to 2015-16 confirmed in the revised total of £67,177.01
- Penalties under s 7 TMA and Sch 41 FA 2008 for 2007-08 to 2015-16 confirmed in the revised total of £43,665.06
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment