Baxter v Mannion [2011] EWCA Civ 120 (22 February 2011)
Registration of title based on a false claim of adverse possession constitutes a mistake under the Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule 4, and rectification is permissible to restore the original proprietor, especially where the factual precondition for registration was not satisfied and it would be unjust not to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Civ 120
- Parties
- Appellant: Steven John Baxter; Respondent: Thomas Francis Mannion
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Rectification of Register, Mistake in Registration
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven John Baxter
Appellant
Thomas Francis Mannion
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether registration of title obtained by a false claim of adverse possession constitutes a 'mistake' under Land Registration Act 2002 Schedule 4
- 2 Whether rectification of the register is permissible after registration following failure to return a notice form
- 3 Whether the burden of proof was correctly applied in the rectification proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Registration of title based on a false claim of adverse possession constitutes a mistake under the Land Registration Act 2002, Schedule 4, and rectification is permissible to restore the original proprietor, especially where the factual precondition for registration was not satisfied and it would be unjust not to rectify.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Register to be rectified to restore Mr Mannion as proprietor
- Mr Baxter's registration as proprietor removed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment