Baxter v Mannion

Baxter v Mannion

Registration of Mr Baxter as proprietor was a mistake because he was not in adverse possession for the requisite period; it would be unjust not to rectify the register to restore Mr Mannion's title, satisfying the statutory requirements for rectification.

Parties
Appellant: Steven John Baxter; Respondent: Thomas Francis Mannion
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Deputy Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Rectification of Register, Mistake in Land Register, Burden of Proof, Land Registration Act 2002

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Steven John Baxter

Appellant

Thomas Francis Mannion

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Deputy Adjudicator to HM Land Registry

  1. 1 Whether registration of Mr Baxter as proprietor was a mistake under Schedule 4, paragraph 5(a) of the Land Registration Act 2002
  2. 2 Whether Mr Baxter was in adverse possession of the Field for the requisite ten-year period
  3. 3 Whether the conditions for rectification under paragraph 6(2) of Schedule 4 were satisfied

Ratio Decidendi

Registration of Mr Baxter as proprietor was a mistake because he was not in adverse possession for the requisite period; it would be unjust not to rectify the register to restore Mr Mannion's title, satisfying the statutory requirements for rectification.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Register to be rectified to restore Mr Mannion as proprietor of the Field