Lambert & Ors, R v [2000] EWCA Crim 3542 (31 July 2000)
Statutory provisions that place a persuasive burden on the defendant to prove certain defences or exceptions, such as diminished responsibility under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 or lack of knowledge under sections 5 and 28 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, do not contravene Article 6(2) ECHR or the Human Rights Act 1998, provided they do not require the defendant to disprove an essential element of the offence and are justified by policy considerations. The appeals are therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] EWCA Crim 3542
- Parties
- Appellant: Steven Lambert; Appellant: Shirley Jordan; Appellant: Mohammed Mudassir Ali; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Presumption of Innocence, Statutory Defences, Human Rights Act 1998, Article 6 ECHR, Diminished Responsibility, Possession of Controlled Drugs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Lambert
Appellant
Shirley Jordan
Appellant
Mohammed Mudassir Ali
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether statutory provisions placing a persuasive burden on defendants to prove certain defences are compatible with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights as incorporated by the Human Rights Act 1998
- 2 Whether sections 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 and sections 5 and 28 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 contravene the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
Statutory provisions that place a persuasive burden on the defendant to prove certain defences or exceptions, such as diminished responsibility under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 or lack of knowledge under sections 5 and 28 of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, do not contravene Article 6(2) ECHR or the Human Rights Act 1998, provided they do not require the defendant to disprove an essential element of the offence and are justified by policy considerations. The appeals are therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeals dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment