Steven Stuart Johnson & Anor, An Application by
The Tribunal found that the restrictive covenants impede a reasonable use of the property for an Ofsted registered childminding business, that the proposed use is reasonable, and that there are no identified beneficiaries of the restrictions. The Tribunal is satisfied that the modification should be granted under section 84(1)(aa).
- Parties
- Applicant: Steven Stuart Johnson; Applicant: Lisa Marie Johnson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Modify Restrictive Covenant / Determination on Written Representations
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Modification of Covenants, Childminding Business, Section 84 Law of Property Act 1925
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Steven Stuart Johnson
Applicant
Lisa Marie Johnson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Application to Modify Restrictive Covenant / Determination on Written Representations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive covenants impede a reasonable use of the property for an Ofsted registered childminding business
- 2 Whether the proposed use is reasonable in the absence of planning permission
- 3 Whether the modification of the covenants is justified under section 84(1)(aa) of the Law of Property Act 1925
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the restrictive covenants impede a reasonable use of the property for an Ofsted registered childminding business, that the proposed use is reasonable, and that there are no identified beneficiaries of the restrictions. The Tribunal is satisfied that the modification should be granted under section 84(1)(aa).
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- The restrictive covenants in the Charges Register for 44 Knights Hill, Aldridge, Walsall WS9 0TG are modified under section 84(1)(aa) of the Law of Property Act 1925 to permit an Ofsted registered childminding business, subject to the applicants signifying acceptance within three months.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment